The latest speeding advert (UK)


Tim

2000 EK9 Type-Rx
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
1,123
What are peoples views on the latest ad, which can be seen here: YouTube - Haunting new road-safety advert launches

Why don't they make the road safety more strict towards children in schools, so they don't play on the damn road? Or do you guys agree that the hard hitting "SPEEDING KILLS" message aimed at drivers is necessary?

Atleast it's not as bad as the last one, showing how the child would have survived had the car been travelling at 30.
YouTube - THINK! - Kill your speed

Firstly, if they had used a car equipped with anti locking brakes the car would have pulled up well short of the child. Secondly, if people are braking like that then they just lack driving skills, going 5mph over the speed limit is the least of their worries.
 
Who cares? The kids ginger anyway! One less on this planet.

For the second video, that car dosn't even have rear brakes or ABS. EK9 would of stopped before hitting that little ****, should of looked before crossing the road anyway, tit.
 
Who cares? The kids ginger anyway! One less on this planet.

For the second video, that car dosn't even have rear brakes or ABS. EK9 would of stopped before hitting that little ****, should of looked before crossing the road anyway, tit.

Discraceful comment :angry:
 
...wellz to me they are kind of disturbing especially the slow mode camera view ... :S
 
Who cares? The kids ginger anyway! One less on this planet.

For the second video, that car dosn't even have rear brakes or ABS. EK9 would of stopped before hitting that little ****, should of looked before crossing the road anyway, tit.

Are you serious?

Wank
 
Things there in England are totally different regrading commercial culture. This kind of commercial would have been banned in Greece for example because of the shocking images it contains. I am against spots like that due to a main reason actually. This clip for example could focus clearly on the child's lack of traffic education which should have been carried out by school, by his teacher, by his father and finally we could put the blame on government that hasn't been proved efficient at this point or didn't install a traffic light at this spot of the road.. So instead of the driver to blame because he was speeding (?) 5miles more, at his place i would like to see a government official, a school principal or the boy's parents who left him unattended. So i am totally against these types of commercial because they are misleading and biased. Furthermore by placing the emphasis on the driver we shift the agenda from politics or the role of institutions to the individual and more precisely to the bad, young, careless, fast driver.
 
you can CLAIM that these ads are misleading and biased as much as you want but im sure the majority of people on this site will acknowledge that kids and kids and have alot to learn hence why it is mostly our responsability as adults to supervise them or look out for their best interests.

as in regards to focusing on kids educations towards road safety. things like this are already in place in most primary schools accross the country.and im sure as kids we have all seen the green cross code adverts etc.
the fact of the matter is...people speed and dont pay enough attention when they are driving and thats why most accidents happen. yes as times things could be avoided by children being taught better etc but im sure we werent all perfect at road safety when we were kids...and im pretty sure even as adults you may not pay full attention to road safety.

im hoping a couple of the comments on this page are jokes as they are discracefull and inconsiderate to anyone who may of been impacted by such an inccident. and it takes away the responsible friendly image that the club holds..





rant over :)
 
Andy - Totally agree with your comments and well put to be honest. Some of the comments made on this page are more than discraceful - Putting it another way how would the people who made those comments feel if it happened to one of their children or someone close??

I have a young child of 8 years and I would be distraught if anything happened to him godforbid, irrespective of who's fault it actually was. Children are taught what is right and wrong especially with cars, roads and traffic safety etc, but at the end of the day they are only children and we are supposed to be responsible enough adults to ensure that the correct measures are in place, after all our children are the future!!

Thank you!
 
ok but do you really believe that 5km do make a lot of difference? If you are careless while driving even 30miles per hour would kill this boy. If your car is not in good condition 30miles will do the damage. What i really see is an obsession with speed limits and not with clear thinking while driving, or an improvement of driving skills etc. We should consider the traffic issue as a system in which there are many players not only the ''bad'' driver and the 2-3% more speed. Because at the end of the you will have ended up being a robot driver, driving your ek9 at the freeway with 100km per hour with the fear of being shot from one of the many speed cameras.. I prefer being more rational and more free than enclaved in silly laws that convince me that the cause of this incident we see in the spot is the 5 miles per hour more speed...
 
It seems a bit exaggerated but i think it needs to be, people don't realize, newer cars stop better, but older cars don't, this is important!!
 
Road saftey should be drumed in from young age. You never know what is going to happen on the roads.

I had the unfortunat luck of having a drunk jump out on me on a stupidly wet night and i had no chance of stopping luckily as my engine was warming up i was doin 40 instead of the 60 limit. I hit him at around 5-10 MPH but that was still enough to send him nearly through my windscreen, it was touching the dash ! He was lucky i stopped called an ambulance etc as he ended up face down in a puddle out cold. He was fine and left hospital that night and luckily for me told the police it was his fault and thanked me for stopping.

That was the only accident i have ever had ( touches wood ) and i beg to think what would have happened if i had been doing 80 or 90 serously though guys its the worst feeling ever when u think u have killed someone.

Even with good brakes, heavy downgearing and 5 years under my belt i had no chance it just goes to show that even when your carefull u cant predict what other idiots are going to do so please people save it for the track.

O and just so people know this was a deserted B-road in the country at 2 am not where u expect a drunk to be.
 
Alright, let me make a calculation. Braking distance at 30miles is 12 meters and you need 14 meters to react (1 second). 26 meters total

At 35mph this becomes 15.7 meters to react. Brakedistance is 5/30=16,67 %. Braking distance will increase quadratic. So 1.1667 * 1.1667 = 1.36, a 36 percent increase. So 1.36 * 12 = 16.3 meters. Total distrance: 32 meters. 6 meters more, which actually is 20ft so they're about right....damn, I hoped to prove them wrong at the end of this piece of text but they're right :D

Disclaimer: I never speed in residential areas where children play, rather drive slower ;)
 
this just comes down to common sense , both driver and pedestrians.

Accidents are not predictable, all we can do is make our judgment on the risk.

I don't like these adverts, it is too scary! and i've seen enough bad driving (not speeding) which causes accidents.

Also another thing is, People (and kids) just walk infront of you at like high streets and lights ALLLLLL the time!!! its like they think they can just do that..it really annoys me. And These type of adverts don't help in tackling that.


But if you blast down residential roads then your just stupid.

Higher driving test standards and maybe test at regular interval might be a better idea....especially for old people.
 
Who cares? The kids ginger anyway! One less on this planet.

For the second video, that car dosn't even have rear brakes or ABS. EK9 would of stopped before hitting that little ****, should of looked before crossing the road anyway, tit.

SLIPCIVIC Your balls aint grown yet, ass wipe!!!!!!!!!!!
 
this just comes down to common sense , both driver and pedestrians.

Absolutely. But in the society we live in (Nanny state) there is no such thing as an accident anymore. There is always blame and there is always a claim.

Travelling at 35mph in a 30 zone when its school kick out time within 1/4 mile of a school is not safe as kids are happy to walk about behind parked cars (X5's so housewives can drive 500meters to collect Rupert from school rather than walking the lazy cow) as they simply don't understand the risk associated with cars. This includes young teens too who are always cocking about (esp in this snow) by main roads!

I remember the Green Cross Code dude (who played Darth Vadar in SW!) coming to my school when I was 6-7 and it stayed with me to this day. Not sure what they have now. Probably some PC bullshit or some guy dressed in an animal suit who can't say anything about how cars can kill you incase of law suits about scaring the kids. Fear works!:D

Its true that the Highway code stopping distances are nothing short or propoganda. An EK9 can stop faster than a Metro 1.1 MOT Failure heap that are still driving around the UK roads - our MOT is too soft thats for sure! A brand new Aston can stop from 70-0 faster than a Smart car can stop from 30-0. We never hear about these facts.

Stopping distances are down to

- driver awareness
- driver skill*
- tyre tread
- tyre pressures
- road temperatures
- road conditions**
- suspension
- vehicle weight
- vehicle weight distribution
- plus much more..

* you would be surprised how many people don't know you can slow a car down using the gearbox and engine:nono:

** UK roads blow in most areas that certainly don't help stopping distances

The main point in the road awareness campaigns should be "mind your surroundings" rather than stare at your speedo as 29mph is safe and 31mph you are a child killing rapist that needs to be hung which is exactly how speeding motorists are portrayed in the media (locally as well as nationally).

On motorways a Metro 1.1 at 90mph is downhill on the rev limit and way over the limit of what is safe. My Civic 1.3 DX is scary above 85mph on motorways. Its a town car designed in 1991 FFS!

An NSX at 120mph is cruising. No wind noise, handling is safe and the car can stop faster than a Metro can from 90mph that's for sure!

Even on an empty road the Metro driver would get 3pts and a fine.
The NSX driver would be on the local news, go to court, get a huge fine and get a ban. His neighbours would look at him as if he is Harold Shipman FFS!

Yet statistically it could be proven the NSX is safer at that speed than a normal car.

Paul Smith (RIP) (Welcome to Safe Speed) did a lot to try and change people opinions of road safety with facts and proper education/reasoning rather than the blanket messages we get in the media about speed.

I'm not saying "speeding is fine, speed everywhere" - there is a time and place for safe increases in speed above the speed limit allocated to that road. Its never a 30/40 road as there are too many unpredictable elements in these types of roads.

Some 50's up here are safe at 70 and some nationals (60) are unsafe at 40! I would love to know the criteria they use for speed limits.

So many parts of motorway in Germany are un-restricted and travelling at 100mph means you are in the slow lane. Traffic merges fine and lane movement is easy. You don't have to keep braking as some mong is in the wrong lane, you don't have to undertake as some BMW driving idiot is in the middle lane.

You come back to the UK and some retard is in the outside lane doing 72mph and gets the arse when you want to overtake him.

One word: EDUCATION. Or in our case, lack of it. The messages we receive in the media are always based on 30mph zones (and as I said above, the wrong message at that) rather than where the accidents actually happen (50's, nationals and motorways). We are statistically one of the safest countries in Europe for road safety. Try driving on a motorway outside Milan in Italy. Scary!
 
Has anyone seen the advert for the motorbike? I though it was kinda cool lol, where he gets wanring signs and then and the end gets shat on by a bird?
 
Looking further than your headlight is a really important factor too :angry2:
 
Back
Top