- Joined
- Oct 16, 2012
- Messages
- 8,917
My brother had some meister r zeta r delivered today for his ep3, so naturally we played lol
I've noticed that the camber is massively limited by the length of the inner tie rods. The toe in goes crazy with even minor changes to camber. Haven't had it on an alignment machine yet but was hoping we could get atleast 2.5deg out of it at a sensible ride hight.
ATM we are probably about a fingers width from the arch on the front and the camber plates are bang in the middle of the adjustment range. That's used the whole toe adjustment on his car.
So my question. Would going lower give us more room for camber? So effectively toeing out as it lowers? Or is it the other way round?
I've searched the interweb but just a lot of contradictions.
Also tempted to make my own range of tie rods for these to sell to the track ep3 guys.
I've noticed that the camber is massively limited by the length of the inner tie rods. The toe in goes crazy with even minor changes to camber. Haven't had it on an alignment machine yet but was hoping we could get atleast 2.5deg out of it at a sensible ride hight.
ATM we are probably about a fingers width from the arch on the front and the camber plates are bang in the middle of the adjustment range. That's used the whole toe adjustment on his car.
So my question. Would going lower give us more room for camber? So effectively toeing out as it lowers? Or is it the other way round?
I've searched the interweb but just a lot of contradictions.
Also tempted to make my own range of tie rods for these to sell to the track ep3 guys.