but i warn you turbo honda's are not for the faint of heart...
how so?
but i warn you turbo honda's are not for the faint of heart...
how so?
If you intend or track the car : K swap is a no brainer
For fun in the street : the rush of the boost is better.
I would go boost in my opinion I just love the pull when the turbo kicks. K series is good but kinda overrated I see too many eg's with k swap up in here CO tho so thats my opinios
BOTH lol
both have there advantages and disvantage
lol its hard but thanxs guys i guess i will find out this coming summer!!yes i am an american and yes people down here with american muscle are big headed and they doubt my honda.. at the end when i beat them they get butt hurt and try to say they wasnt ready or im spraying or whatever. im leaning towards to the kswap thanxs to you guys lol.no front mount = i can say i still have my gsr lol. i mean my car is pretty quick its a 95 gsr motor with cams but stock bottom end. made 183 when tuned. with a stock cat and small headers =[. i thought doing kswap would cost more then going boost? for a complete clip for the k20a is about 5800, plus all the other parts you need in order to install the kswap like motor mounts and kpro etc..
i had a boosted gsr on 10lbs a while back.. completley stock internals ebay turbo kit, a skunk 2 intake mani and it was tuned on chrome i daily drove it, and beat the hell out of it while driving it and nothing ever broke.. soo i would do gsr.. just because you already have it. it would only make sense. k series motors arent really that special